What it is
- Detail
- A Startup School service for finding a co-founder, separate from applying to YC [1]
Founder matching · About guide
YC Co-Founder Matching is a free Startup School service for finding a co-founder. It suits founders who can wait up to a week for approval and work within 15 invitations a week. Its public record is company counts and a few user accounts, so its published rules are the surest guide. [1] [2] [6]
Add Omnitwine as a preferred source on Google| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| What it is | A Startup School service for finding a co-founder, separate from applying to YC[1] |
| Who can join | Anyone seriously looking for a co-founder, solo or with one, with or without an idea[1] |
| Cost | Free[2] |
| Approval | Up to a week; criteria not published[1] |
| Outreach | 15 invitations a week[1] |
| Recommended time | 2 to 4 weeks of close work after a match[1] |
| Scale claims | Over 100K matches (undated); 9,000 matches across 4,500 founders at the July 2021 launch[2] [3] |
| Best at | Free access and open eligibility for solo founders and early teams[2] [1] |
| Weakest at | Showing outcomes: no acceptance or team rate is published[2] |
YC Co-Founder Matching is a Startup School product, separate from applying to YC. You create a profile, look at suggested co-founders, and send up to 15 invitations a week. A match forms when the other person accepts, and then you arrange a call. Joining doesn’t improve your chances of getting into YC, and the service is for co-founders only, not hiring or selling. [1] [2]
Expect a wait before you can start. Approval takes up to a week, and after that you spend your weekly 15 invitations on profiles that fit. Sample profiles show a headshot, name, school, employer and bio, so people judge each other on those details. YC recommends 2 to 4 weeks of close work before you judge whether a match fits. [1] [2]
The praise in the public record is thin. A 2023 Hacker News staff comment says over 20 teams that met on the site got funded, and the homepage claims over 100K matches. Neither says how the figure was counted. [4] [2]
The frustrations are about outcomes and control: a match that vanished, a founder who reached 3 of at least 70 profiles, and profile visibility that the matching page and privacy policy describe differently. [6] [5] [7]
It suits a solo or early founder who has a clear need for a co-founder and time for a week of approval and a few weeks of close work. It suits less well a founder who wants a hire, a vendor or a guaranteed match, or one who needs a profile kept from anyone who isn’t an approved member. [1] [7]
Bibliography