Sign up and describe your goals
- Who acts
- You
- The clock
- The 2020 form asked for objectives, interests and meeting times
- If nobody acts
- The account can be deactivated if matching finds nothing (Dec 2022 report) [5] [2]
Professional introductions · How it works guide
Lunchclub ran on a clock the service set, so you could not choose the time or the person. These steps describe the 2020 to 2024 accounts, since the app has had no update since March 2022. A missed step could cost you a call, and the reports show where people got stuck. [5] [6] [1]
Add Omnitwine as a preferred source on Google| Step | Who acts | The clock | If nobody acts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sign up and describe your goals | You | The 2020 form asked for objectives, interests and meeting times | The account can be deactivated if matching finds nothing (Dec 2022 report)[5] [2] |
| Profile approval | The service | Calls were booked after approval (2024 review); no set wait is published | No calls are booked[6] |
| Match and schedule | The service | Calls of 30 to 60 minutes, weekly if you set it | Recurring meetings can be booked without your knowledge[7] [8] [2] |
| Attend the call | Both of you | 30 to 60 minutes | A no-show or late cancellation loses the slot, often with no reason given[8] [2] |
| Pause or leave | You | Pausing did not stop new matches (Jan 2023 report) | Delete the app; the policy gives no period for keeping data after closure[2] [4] |
Lunchclub appears to be retired. Its latest App Store release is dated 3 Mar 2022, and the status page lists the dated signals behind that verdict. The booking process below describes the 2020 to 2024 service, and this page is kept for reference. [1] [11] [12]
In 2020 the sign-up asked how many meetings you wanted each week and when you were free. A February 2024 review says calls were booked only after profile approval. Every later step ran on the service's schedule, so a single missed step in the chain could cost you a call. [5] [6]
Sign-up and profile approval came first. The 2024 reviewer describes approval before any call was scheduled, and the 2020 form asked for objectives, interests and a conversation starter. No account gives a consistent wait for approval, so plan for an unknown delay. [6] [5]
Calls followed, and their length varied by account: 45 minutes in a 2020 blog run of seven weekly calls, 30 to 45 minutes with agendas built from profiles in a 2020 Blind reply, and one hour in the 2024 review. A 2023 commenter took three random 45-minute calls a week. Feedback after each call was meant to shape later matches. [7] [8] [6] [9] [5]
Every member was also someone else's match. In a September 2020 Blind post, a match stopped responding after a confirmed time and cancelled about 15 minutes before the call, with no reason given. In a 2020 blog run, one match asked to reschedule twice and then never came. [8] [7]
No-shows and late cancellations were the most common complaint: 5 of 25 user reports describe one, from 2020 to 2023. That is 5 of 25 accounts that chose to write, so it shows the problem happened, not how often. [2] [3] [10] [8] [7]
Pausing did not stop new matches for an 18-month member, who then deleted the app. A December 2022 reviewer's account was deactivated two days after sign-up because matching found nothing relevant, and the review gives no further reason. [2]
Sign-in was the other sticking point. The release notes list log-in fixes in October and November 2021, and a February 2023 reviewer still could not pass the login screen after repeated code requests. [1] [2]
Sign in, and if the code never arrives, stop there. If you can book a call, confirm it the day before and keep your calendar and contact permissions to the minimum, since the policy reads calendar data by default. The status page sets out the dated signals, and the alternatives page lists services you can test now. [4]
Bibliography